Like many of the fine folks who contribute to this blog, I’m
from Alabama. And, therefore, I have a soft spot for Harper Lee and
To
Kill A Mockingbird. You can imagine the range of emotions I felt when I
learned that she had a “new” book coming out this year ... but
the controversy surrounding it made me a little sick to my stomach. I can think of few things worse than
someone taking advantage of an author’s dementia for monetary gain.
An article from The Onion summed up my feelings perfectly.
But, I had to read it. I had to. In October, I borrowed my brother’s copy of Go
Set A Watchman (her caretaker gets no money from me!) and finally finished it over Thanksgiving.
This book is no To Kill a Mockingbird. I don’t think I would
have finished it if it hadn’t been the Harper Lee book. It didn’t have the same
driving plot, intensity, or life lessons.
However, there is some great writing in the book. Parts are
clever and felt very real. The south is hot and muggy. Ice cream on a hot day
is delicious and can take you back to memories of your childhood. Games you
played as kids had hidden meaning you might not have realized at the time. She
says all of that better than I just did.
I was perhaps most enraptured with the scene where Scout’s
aunt throws a fancy party. Scout/Jean Louise would come in and out of
conversations, hearing only bits and pieces of them as she was simultaneously
frustrated with her aunt and the party in general. The bits of conversations
were spot on, and the scene perfectly put people in certain groups that they
would be in at a party.
I also have to admit that this book felt slightly like The
Help in the way the protagonist was the fish out of water in the southern town – and
especially at that party – because of her life, her ambitions, and her marital
status. It irked me that the comparison was so easy to make, and I think it's because this book just doesn't have the plot it needs to feel unique or to be about more than a girl coming home for a visit and feeling like everyone is the absolute worst.
And, let’s talk about one thing that struck me throughout:
At times, this book felt like it was trying to be a young adult novel or a
romantic novel. Scout and Henry (who is her longtime boyfriend at this point)
talk a great deal about their relationship, and she gives him advice on women
quite a bit. I also didn’t expect to learn the story of
Scout getting her period. In other words, there were scenes in here I didn't expect. Sometimes I felt like I was reading a Sweet Valley High book, Are you there God? It’s Me, Margaret, or a new version of Catcher in
the Rye (because Scout sure seemed to feel like her town was full of phonies).
There is one good point at the end about the importance of not tying your conscience to someone else's conscience (or at least your perception of it). Also, in a related note, Atticus wasn't the evil character I feared he would be after hearing rumors about this book. He was definitely not perfect, but he wasn't the raging racist I expected; he was really just more of a pragmatist than the prophetic voice we met in Mockingbird. Still, it's disappointing. But, also, he's not real, so it's not worth getting actually upset about (I'm talking to you, WORLD AT LARGE).
I want to talk about this book. What did you think? Was the
ending satisfying? Did you end up hating Atticus? What
did you like? What didn’t you like? What did you learn?
Who else has read this book and wants to talk about this with me?